Logo: - click to return to Home Page

Report - Section 6.2

6.2   The Rights of Way Condition Survey 2000

The Countryside Agency's survey provides a mass of data on the problems that users face, and the frequency with which they can expect to encounter them. Some of this data is available only for all rights of way: statistics for bridleways and other specific rights of way are not always separated out.

Table 6.2: Problems faced by users of public rights-of-way

Percentage of rights of way properly signed where they left metalled roads 67%
The report estimates that 105,600 signposts are missing
Percentage of network that was:
Easy to follow without a map 62%
Possible to follow with the aid of OS 1:25,000 map 34%
Difficult or impossible to follow even with a map 4%
CA 94 Rights of way condition survey 2000

Table 6.3: Estimated total numbers / length of obstacles

  Footpaths Other rights of way % of ‘problem’ occurring on ‘other rights of way’
Wall/fence/hedge 35,000 5,000 8.0
Electric fence 8,500 450 5.0
Unbridged stream 4,000 700 14.9
Steep / slippery slope 115,500 103,500 47.3
Crops / ploughed surface (km) 6,740 1,000 12.9
Surface natural vegetation (km) 4,190 2,365 36.1
Natural vegetation at side / above (km) 145 585 80.1
Narrow path / linear hazard (km) 185 335 64.4
Muddy / boggy / flooded (km) 1,030 913 47.0
Rough surface / deep ruts (km) 450 817 64.5
Misleading sign 2,000 3,100 60.8
Erosion (km) 20 64 76.2
CA 94 Rights of way condition survey 2000

‘Other rights of way’ contribute 22.3% of the network. Problems shown in red in Table 6.4 above occur more frequently on "other rights of way" than would be expected from their share of the network. This suggests that bridleways and other rights of way used by horse riders may be particularly affected in these ways.

The following table indicates the relative frequency with which different users may encounter problems on rights of way. This indicates that carriage drivers are the users most likely to encounter problems.

Table 6.4: Frequency of problems with rights-of-way, by user

  Carriage driver Horse-
rider
Cyclist Walker
Serious problems per 10km (a 'serious problem' is an unusable crossing or an obstruction that rendered a route unusable) 8.9 4.2 4.7 4.7
Practical experience of using paths - percentage found to be 'satisfactory' or 'usable, but with some inconvenience' 76% 89% 87% 89%
CA 94 Rights of way condition survey 2000

Horse riders appear more likely to meet an obstruction on a road used as a public path than on a bridleway. Again, carriage drivers face particular difficulties.

Table 6.6: Obstacles for users

  Carriage
driver
Horse-
rider
Cyclist Walker
Muddy / boggy / flooded 12.9% 25.4% 12.7% 16.3%
Surface natural vegetation 16.0% 22.3% 17.1% 25.0%
Surface natural vegetation 16.0% 22.3% 17.1% 25.0%
Rough surface / deep ruts 12.5% 11.2% 5.0% 2.8%
Natural vegetation at side/above 18.8% 10.4% 32.9% 7.8%
Wall/fence/hedge 5.6% 7.4% 7.7% 17.9%
Crops / ploughed 2.1% 6.4% 5.3% 12.9%
Other - man made 6.6% 5.0% 4.5% 5.0%
Misleading sign 7.9% 3.8% 4.3% 1.4%
Other - natural 2.5% 3.7% 3.5% 2.7%
Unbridged stream 0.7% 1.3% 1.1% 2.2%
Steep / slippery slope 1.1% 1.3% 1.7% 1.3%
Narrow path 11.8% 1.3% 2.4% 0.7%
Erosion 1.3% 0.9% 1.0% 0.4%
Electric fence 0.2% 0.5% 0.7% 3.6%
CA 94 Rights of way condition survey 2000
Ranked by difficulty for horse riders

Ranked by difficulty for horse riders
<<< Previous Contents Page >>> Next

© High Weald Bridleways Group - 2003

This site was designed and is maintained by Bill Emmott